You can also see the same behavior a bit in the lower frequencies at the high mid section.
Smaart v8 wrap phase drivers#
I see this also if i'm to close to a line array in the low to mid frequency range where the response is going from omni to slightly directional until you get to the high drivers which are directional.
In the image above you see in the blue line a semi straight line from 315 to just past 500 a jump and than on to just before 1k and on it goes. įor the rest of it : it's a comparison of data between both analyzers which is not done at this time (still need to compare some other stuff but that's for another measurement session I had to do 3 more products after this 1 so i was happy to get this done and the 3 other measurements on 1 day again the jumps are definitely multiple drivers They make the sound more natural (sorry can't put it in any other words). To bad the intelli-x processor doesn't have elliptic filters up to now like the xta or Galileo has. Specially the onax vs ofax was something we needed to know and it came out rather well (could be better but not bad at all for a first try). We just needed to test this before moving forward.
There was no foam(? sorry i'm from the Netherlands so sometimes my english fails me) on the inside of the cab so this still has to be done. Īlso this is a brand new product and this is a good start but not the final product. If i take more distance from the cab coherence is going to drop but the ratio in distance difference between the multiple drivers reduces and the phase is going to flatten out a bit more but it will get harder to make choices regarding x-over/allpass filters. So if i get to close to it i'll see multiple drivers and jumps in the phase and magnitude screen. There's about 10 drivers in this 1 cabinet.
Smaart v8 wrap phase how to#
Maybe 1 of the guy's from rational knows how to do this Matt I had the same problem with the Mid-highs in the first screenshot (big jumps just past 4K). Suffice to say that there is real world comparative analysis out there. I'm not going to call him out as I know he's a busy guy and I don't want to volunteer his time. Well, I know he was working on it, I'm not aware if he completed it. I am aware of a forum member who does use both v7 and SIM3 and has done a rather detailed comparative study. So I stopped writing and decided not to post it. Even if read, I don't know that the crunchy process and math bits would even assist anyone in discerning what the impact is.
But the post was rather large and I don't know that anyone would even care to read it. I'd started writing a post that described the basic process and illustrated some of the differences. So even if both are doing a 16k FFT there is a difference in process. Demo versions of Smaart cannot be re-activated or turned into licensed, working version of Smaart.
Smaart v8 wrap phase software#
2) At the end of the demo period, Smaart Demo software will expire. Rational Acoustics reserves the right to lengthen, or shorten, the standard Demo period at our discretion. For example, Smaart does overlapped FFT's, whereas SIM does end to end FFT's. 1) The standard Smaart Demo period of 30 days. I think some of the confusion or mystery is that how the underlying processes operate aren't common knowledge. If my assumptions are correct, which I can't prove because AFAIK Rational refuses to disclose these values, SMAART evidently has higher frequency resolution, read detail, but also longer TC's. Since SMAART appearantly uses fewer TC's and in result fewer and different crossovers points between frequency spans, I fashioned the data in a way that IMHO allows for some comparison. The values for SMAART I reasoned from the smallest frequency increment for each frequency span in MTW in relation to sample rate, smoothing turned off 48 kHz. But maybe that doesn't belong in this post.Īs for the values in the screenshot of my Excel spreadsheet. I'm only trying to debate the difference. Ich bin Frederic Linker aus Herne und erzähle euch auf dieser Webseite ein paar Geschichten aus meinem Leben.Ich bin Frederic Linker aus Herne und erzähle euch auf dieser Webseite ein paar Geschichten aus meinem Leben. Both Meyer and Rational chose their TC's with great care. I'm a very content SMAART user for a decade now, and it's the only difference, by design, I can think of, in reply to the OP. The difference I'm trying to explain, to the best of my abilities, is very minute and arguably of no interest to the average user. The facing the world babywearing should only be a phase that is directly. I wonder about the tradeoff between frequency resolution and time constants in relation to "room" influence or maybe even contamination. Extremists of babywearing world that are consider baby wraps as the best. Nelayes ( Montag, 14.I don't question the frequency resolution of SMAART, so maybe accuracy is a poor choice of words.
0 kommentar(er)
